Search for: "CLARK V US" Results 501 - 520 of 3,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  [1] Memec plc v IRC (1998) 71 TC 77 [2] Paragraphs 30-38 [2013] EWCA Civ 63 [3] ibid, Paragraph 37 [4] ibid, Paragraph 76 [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Retired Judge James Boddie Jr., sitting ad hoc for Justice Clark, was particularly persuaded by the Third Circuit’s reasoning in a prior riverboat casino case, Breaux v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:54 am by Walter Olson
Constitution sold with a parental advisory warning (hat tip: reader Clark S.). [read post]
  Lord Clarke repeated a useful quotation of Longmore LJ from Barclays Bank plc v HHY Luxembourg SARL [2010] EWCA Civ 1248: “If a clause is capable of two meanings…it is quite possible that neither meaning will flout common sense. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:48 am
The recent decision of the Hamburg Regional Court on GEMA v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Article V tells us that we can amend the Constitution by calling a national convention to propose changes, and then ratifying those proposals in state conventions. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:41 am by INFORRM
  The decision on meaning is a useful distinguishing of Modi v Clarke and widens the parameters in which a defamation claim can be initially advanced, although this will only be applicable in specific circumstances. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:49 am
Birmingham City Council v Rose Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) concerned an appeal arising from the judgment of a Costs Judge regarding two conditional fee agreements used to fund litigation between Birmingham City Council (the Council) and Rose Forde, a Council tenant.Miss Forde entered a conditional fee agreement with McGrath Solicitors in relation to proceedings against the Council for failure to repair her property (CFA1). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by MARK GREAVES, MATRIX CHAMBERS
By contrast, as the Court of Appeal noted at para 42, in many of the leading cases the treatment in itself caused disadvantage: in Clark v Novacold Ltd [1999] ICR 951 the claimant was dismissed; in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] UKHL the claim was evicted; and in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] ICR 337 the claimant chief inspector had part of her duties as a manager removed. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]