Search for: "Campbell v. People" Results 501 - 520 of 772
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2011, 9:26 am by INFORRM
At 10.30am there were judgments from Mr Justice Tugendhat in TSE v News Group and Goodwin v News Group. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:36 pm
Allowing a macho man -- a guy who beats people up for a living -- to use the V-word must, therefore, have seemed strategically sensible. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:57 am by INFORRM
Some of these people were celebrities like Naomi Campbell, JK Rowling, and John Terry. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:59 am by Dianne Saxe
Dianne Saxe and Jackie Campbell May 2011 [i] Renzetti S. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am by INFORRM
As Lord Hope said of Miss Campbell (paragraph 120 of Campbell v MGN Ltd), “… it is not enough to deprive Miss Campbell of her right to privacy that she is a celebrity and that her private life is newsworthy. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:16 pm by Dave_Fagundes
  They’re parodies (because they mock the original work directly), and while that’s not dispositive of the issue, parodies are a form of use that’s strongly favored as fair following Campbell v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
The claimant sued after the council sent an email to a number of people, informing them that her name had been put onto its “violent persons register”. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm by pfriedman
The proposition that an appropriation must comment on the original to constitute fair use originates in commentary on Campbell v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:12 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Ontario lawyer Chris Jaglowitz of Gardiner Miller Arnold on the firm's Ontario Condo Law Blog Kiobel Gets a Kissing Cousin: DC Circuit Holds TVPA Does Not Apply To Non-Natural Persons - New York attorney Russell Jackson on his blog Consumer Class Actions & Mass Torts How Does D'Oench, Duhme Apply to Failed Credit Unions: Campbell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  The second is entitled “MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom: Naomi Campbell v. the Tabloid Press” which deals with the relationship between privacy and celebrity. [read post]