Search for: "Clinton v. Clinton"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am
McConnell’s argument is that those procedures were adopted by unanimous vote for the Clinton impeachment and that precedent should be followed here. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
Among the most important outstanding issues as impeachment moves to the Senate is whether senators will attempt to obtain the testimony of senior executive branch officials who have, to date, declined to testify. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am
Chief Justice William Rehnquist was similarly meek during the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, although he was called upon to do less because the case was effectively submitted to the Senate on stipulated facts. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:46 am
There is a unanimous Supreme Court case on point—United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Slightly more plausibly, he could propose a special order of the kind that governed President Clinton’s impeachment trial in 1999. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
NAMUDNO v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 12:29 am
Andrew Johnson's historical reputation has suffered much more than Bill Clinton's. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:48 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 10:28 am
Twenty-six words in the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
[v] He taught me a lot even though he was unable to sway the Nebraska Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:59 pm
" Id. at 102 (quoting Lockyer v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
On October 25 & 26, Windsor Law proudly hosted the 2019 conference of the Canadian Association for Legal Ethics. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
In 1976 in Elrod v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 3:00 pm
Federal Trade Commission, and Saenz v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
The 1895 decision in Sparf v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
The 1895 decision in Sparf v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
” In fact, Clinton’s defense lawyers never raised the clear statement rule argument. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
As Scalia noted in RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
