Search for: "Court v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 208,548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:41 am by Unreported Opinions
The court then found Appellant guilty on […] The post EMMANUEL AKUM v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 8:07 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Plain error review — Failure to preserve Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of first-degree assault and related offenses, Niaja McCoy, appellant, contends that the court erred in “permitt[ing] the State to” play recordings during which she “invoked her right to counsel” and indicated that she “was […] The post NIAJA McCOY v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 2:17 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: CRIMINAL – HOMICIDE-DELIBERATE DA 13-0623, 2016 MT 1, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:59 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0375, DA 10-0521, DA 10-0522, DA 10-0523, DA 10-0525, DA 10-0526, 2011 MT 274, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee,  v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:18 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: CRIMINAL – SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITHOUT CONSENT DA 13-0856, 2016 MT 14, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court’s Decision in United States v Aguilar By a vote of 8-1, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals with respect to Aguilar’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:13 am by Schachtman
The Court release its orders this morning, which included a denial of certiorari in Harkonen v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:16 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0327, 2010 MT 7, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 2:50 pm
Recent Tax Opinion Highlight: The opinion of United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit in Arthur Bedrosian v. [read post]