Search for: "DUKES v. STATE" Results 501 - 520 of 2,262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2018, 6:20 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also overruled various objections to the magistrate’s memorandum and order as to expert testimony on class certification (Chen-Oster v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:51 pm by Edward Smith
Using Expert Witnesses in Your Personal Injury Cases I’m Ed Smith, a Personal Injury Lawyer in Sacramento. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
Piwowar even went so far as to issue a formal statement about the lack of communication to him about the SEC data breach, stating:   “I commend Chairman Clayton for initiating an assessment of the SEC’s internal cybersecurity risk profile and approach to cybersecurity from a regulatory perspective. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Josh Blackman
The letter states: As Attorney General of the United States, I have a duty to defend the Constitution and to faithfully execute the laws passed by Congress. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
It is the combination of the ‘re-emergence of the state’ from out of the shadows of multilateralism and international governance, a growing discontent and backlash from multiple sectors of society directed against existing international norms and institutions and the limited ability of the latter to address serious contemporary problems, which generate a sense of crisis and a possible plunge towards world disorder (Although, it may also be claimed that… [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s:  SEC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
**Frakes and Wasserman had discussed "cohort effects" in 65 Duke L.J. 1601 (2016) :The numerous hiring-year coefficients presented in Table A1 are meant to be interpreted with reference to the omitted hiring-year cohort - that is, the 1993 cohort. [read post]