Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 501 - 520
of 2,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2015, 7:12 am
United States, Nos. 15-135 C & 15-136 C (2015) involved a State Department solicitation to construct embassy facilities in Mozambique. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:29 am
Patent Nos. 5,946,647. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:01 am
In re Committee on Advanced Tuition Payment, Serial Nos. 88079982 and 88079989 (September 30, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:20 am
Central Coast Agriculture, Inc., Appeals Nos. 22-16190 and 16281 (9th Cir. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:34 am
For example, during the discovery period, Outlaw had requested production by the City of, inter alia, all excessive-force complaints against HPD officers from 1994 to 2004, and all of Allen's HPD disciplinary records (see Outlaw's document request to the City, Nos. 4, 6). [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:18 am
Patent Nos. 6,906,981 and 6,026,059. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm
Patent Nos. 6,936,999, 6,949,916, 7,000,125, 7,049,798, 7,080,265, and 7,456,617. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
Patent Nos. 7,945,856; 8,082,501; and 8,145,998. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:28 am
Beef, Inc., Nos. 8:08CV90, 8:08CV99, 2010 WL 604629 (D.Neb. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 9:42 pm
Mitchell, No. 116311 -- Does waiver of a personal jurisdiction objection operate retrospectively, validating everything that has gone before, or only prospectively? [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 7:48 am
In re Casinola LLC, Serial Nos. 90115759 and 90115777 (July 5, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
The excess insurers had argued on appeal that, among other things, an appraisal action does not involve a "violation. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:53 am
Nos. 1529901 and 4104964 were relevant to the Examining Attorney’s ultimate decision. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:08 am
It has no other meaning and does not look like a coined term. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:40 am
Hendrixlicensing.com Ltd, Nos. 11-35858 (9th Cir. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:14 am
Its success in enforcing its trademarks when others relinquished their rights does not mean its claims were meritorious, since settlements are often motivated by factors other than the validity of the claims asserted. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
Patent Nos. 8,845,125 and 9,157,200, both titled “Vehicle Barrier System with Illuminating Gate Arm and Method. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 4:16 pm
(Supreme Court Nos. 11-1154, 11-1278) In this case, one of the two questions presented to the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 4:46 am
So does this applicant own some rights to the word "whale"? [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:11 am
Patent Nos. 8,607,804 and 8,651,118 (and its subsidiary owns Design Patent D696,456) relating to a hair styling device. [read post]
