Search for: "Does, 1-13"
Results 501 - 520
of 21,728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
Lippincott v Whisenhunt, No. 13-0926 (Tex. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 1:13 pm
Att’y Gen., Docket Number 13-13069, Decided September 3, 2014; Circuit Court held that nunc pro tunc stand-alone INA § 212(h) waiver does not exist. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 3:44 am
We find that in the field, annual disk replacement rates typically exceed 1%, with 2-4% common and up to 13% observed on some systems. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:25 am
The ruling does not mention evocation.According to the CJEU, Art. 13(1)(d) on misleading practices could be invoked to prohibit the reproduction of the shape or appearance characterising a product covered by a PDO. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:05 am
”Today's decision The CJEU began its analysis by recalling that when interpreting a provision of EU law it is necessary to consider not only its wording but also the context in which it occurs and the objectives pursued by the rules of which it is part.This said, the Court considered the wording of heading (b) of the second subparagraph of Article 13(1) and noted that:"although that provision does not mention moral prejudice as an… [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 9:45 am
"International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, vol. 13, no. 2 (2017) [contents]- Mix of articles, including "Investigating the diversity of Canada’s refugee population and its health implications: does one size fit all? [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm
Dirunavir is listed on Table 1. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
" Rather, the court explained that the regulations provide that such an "application for review maybe denied" [sic] by the Board, in its discretion, where the application "does not comply with prescribed formatting, completion and service submission requirements. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
" Rather, the court explained that the regulations provide that such an "application for review maybe denied" [sic] by the Board, in its discretion, where the application "does not comply with prescribed formatting, completion and service submission requirements. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:07 am
February 13, 2012): The government has the better argument. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 7:04 pm
(Art. 12) Publishing transparency reports (Art. 13, 23, etc.) [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:56 pm
DOE #1 ET. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, there is no legal reason preventing the board, when exercising its discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA, from taking into consideration the issues of novelty and inventive step on which the opposition was based from the very beginning. [7] When deciding on the admissibility of late filed requests, the board does not consider it as a necessary prerequisite that the proposed amendments overcome all outstanding objections with certainty but that they result at least in… [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Furthermore, although the application does contain theoretical examples how enhancers which increase the expression of the LIPG polypeptide or which increase the enzymatic activity of the LIPG polypeptide could be identified, the application as filed does not contain any guidance for the skilled person which would allow her/him an educated guess as to for example a particular chemical structural class to which the enhancers recited in claim 1 belong. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:38 am
In In re Cochran, Ch. 13 Case No. 15-52314-aec, 2016 WL 4575557 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
Amicus brief at 13. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” CAADCA § 31(a)(1)(B) (emphasis added). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Why Does This Matter? [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 4:35 pm
In addition, as noted in decision T 168/99 [1] cited by the patent proprietor, withdrawal of subject-matter does not necessarily mean that it has formally been abandoned. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 4:35 pm
In addition, as noted in decision T 168/99 [1] cited by the patent proprietor, withdrawal of subject-matter does not necessarily mean that it has formally been abandoned. [read post]
