Search for: "Does 1-152" Results 501 - 520 of 868
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
But that does not dispose of the constitutional question whether misrepresentation of religious experience or belief is prosecutable; it rather emphasizes the danger of such prosecutions…. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm by Terry Briscoe
NLRB, 721 F.3d 152 (4th Cir. 2013).Had the rule gone into effect, the impact on employers who failed to post the notice could have been severe. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The same applied for the 11th to 12th years following decisions T 170/83 [6], and T 152/82 [8-9].The RS rejected both the main and the auxiliary request.The Board partially allowed the appeal:[2] Under A 86(1), first and second sentences, renewal fees for the European patent application shall be paid to the EPO in accordance with the Implementing Regulations. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
However, it disallowed the taxpayer’s claim for the two dependency exemption deductions.The Tax Court began its analysis by pointing out that under section 152(e)(1), the child who is in the custody of one or both of the child’s parents for more than one-half of the calendar year and receives more than one-half of his or her support from parents who are divorced is treated as the qualifying child of the custodial parent. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 [8] The appellant-opponent has argued that claim 1 does not fulfil one prerequisite to qualify as a second medical use-claim in accordance with G 5/83, namely that a “medicament” is used in the treatment. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 3:41 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
., expenses) for any prior taxable year, gross income does not include amounts referred to in subsection (a) if such amounts are paid, directly or indirectly, to the taxpayer to reimburse the taxpayer for expenses incurred by him for the medical care (as defined in section 213(d)) of the taxpayer, his spouse, his dependents (as defined in section 152, determined without regard to subsections (b)(1), (b)(2), and (d)(1)(B) thereof), and any child (as defined in… [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
It is important to ensure the technical meaning does not override the need to restrain the meaning within a legal context. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
DOES 1-152 WD Wash 2013http://t.co/PKj30HJC9y -> NSA spying broke rules thousands of times, report says http://t.co/5SFeqEl8eK -> Washington Post, CNN, Time hacked by alleged Pro-Assad group http://t.co/Op1xWxSEjD -> California 'revenge porn' bill passes Senate http://t.co/ajBHkVeuxB -> YouTube Windows Phone app blocked by Google http://t.co/ngfghbaBaX -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-08-15: Stock fraud scams tough to combat in internet age… [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 4:01 pm
It is not a proper expert report for trial purposes because it does not fully set out the facts, observations or assumptions on which it was based. [read post]