Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 501 - 520
of 9,547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2013, 5:51 am
Just because in most reverse micelle systems the active ingredient is packaged into the interior of the micelle does not make it unclear that Appellant desires to do just the opposite.We reverse the rejection of claims 1, 4-8, 15, 16, 19, 20, 23-25, and 27-33 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:00 pm
Myriad Genetics, Inc. established that that isolated DNA is a product of nature and therefore not patent eligible under Section 101 of Title 35 of the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:09 am
Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1562-63 (Fed.Cir. 1991).We sustain this rejection of claims 1-12.The appellants PREVAILED on their arguments about the 102 rejections, butbecause they lost on 112: DECISIONAs all claims remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:09 am
By John Filar AtwoodThe first half of 2023 saw 77 companies complete IPOs, down 35 percent from the 2022 six-month total of 119. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:21 am
") Published: 7/7/2014 11:35 AM [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Does an Unequal Allocation Household Chores Lead to a Divorce? [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm
That is coming at a time when the estate tax exemption next year declines to $1 million from the current $5.1 million, and when the tax rate on non-exempt assets rises from 35% to 55%. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Kali Singh [(1977) 1 SCC 57], Mr. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
However, the PTAB entered a new ground of rejection for claims 1 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
G 1/05 [11.1] and T 600/08 [2.3]. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:55 am
However, Alliance did not file its petition until three days later on November 1, 2010. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:53 pm
Gov’t (filed on Sept 17, 2019) followed by party briefs within 14 days (October 1, 2019). [read post]
23 May 2024, 11:21 am
§ 135(b)(1). [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:26 pm
“Motor 8bicycle” does not include an electric bicycle.9Section 7. 340.01 (30) (b) of the statutes is repealed.10Section 8. 340.01 (35) of the statutes is amended to read:11340.01 (35) “Motor vehicle" means a vehicle, including a combination of 2 or 12more vehicles or an articulated vehicle, which is self-propelled, except a vehicle 13operated exclusively on a rail. [read post]
8 May 2017, 12:43 am
However, document D2 did disclose such an automated use of the system in claims 35-38.The Board does not agree with the Examining division and offers the following catchwords:In determining what is made available to the public within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC by a prior art patent document, it must be borne in mind that it is the description which chiefly serves to disclose the invention in a manner that it may be carried out, whereas the chief function of the claims is to… [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:56 am
At base, the dispute here centers on one of Defendants’ references: a LeakMaster A240 smoke machine . . . made by Plaintiff and sold on July 1, 1998 in Encinitas, California. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:04 pm
Avoid excessive costs (sometimes called a “feasibility” principle), in which case, if we stipulate that costs greater than $35 are excessive, it could choose either Options C or D. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
