Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 501 - 520 of 2,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 8:03 pm by KC Johnson
I'm pretty sure I write just as well as she does, and I have many more interesting stories. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:07 pm by Dan Flynn
  The agency does not favor public notification in all instances, only when time remains to make vaccinating restaurant employees or customers worthwhile. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
 State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27 : (1950) 51 Cri LJ 1383 : 1950 SCR 88). [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 7:51 am by Arina Shulga
 The good news is that this does not affect the amounts that the company can raise in other exempt (non-crowdfunding) offerings during that same 12-month period. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Rees, No. 07-5439 Kentucky's lethal injection protocol used as its method of execution does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Re s. 1, while the retrospective operation of the no contact provision in s. 161(1) (c) is not a reasonable limit on the s. 11 (i) right, the retrospective operation of the internet prohibition in s. 161(1) (d) is. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The Board notes, however, that this does not mean that the scope of protection conferred by a claim is generally limited by the description. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
They were not inspired by article 5(1)(f) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and it does not follow that, because detention would be permissible under article 5(1)(f), it is also permissible under United Kingdom law. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 8:55 pm by Cameron Harvey (AU)
Under s36(1) of the Copyright Act,2 a person who is not, and does not have a licence from, the copyright owner, and does not themselves engage in an infringing act, can nevertheless be found to infringe copyright if they authorised the infringing act. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 8:55 pm by Cameron Harvey (AU)
Under s36(1) of the Copyright Act,2 a person who is not, and does not have a licence from, the copyright owner, and does not themselves engage in an infringing act, can nevertheless be found to infringe copyright if they authorised the infringing act. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 8:57 pm
We were banned in China after only 1 day. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Simply, Preston’s uncorroborated, “little more than a vague idea” does not meet even this standard. [read post]