Search for: "Does I & II"
Results 501 - 520
of 23,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2013, 6:51 am
The group II claims survived because molecular weight was expressed differently than for group I. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 3:10 am
In a recent article, I discussed the impact that bankruptcy might have on a debtor's credit score. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 11:19 am
” [This Kat is quoting from September 23rd issue of The Economist, since he does not have an on-line subscription to the Wall Street Journal.]To appreciate these words (a piece by Daniel Drezner in The Washington Post called it “the most extraordinary op-ed of 2017”), we need to reach back a bit into history. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:04 am
§ 214.2 (f) (13) (ii). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 12:33 am
This is Part II of our preview of the oral arguments in Unite Here! [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 10:51 am
The Final Rule does not tell Agencies which rating system to use. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:44 am
This report - relating to inspections conducted in 2007 about 2006 audits, with Part I released in May 2008 - raises a serious public policy issue of why is such a Part II report citing such serious deficiencies in audit work permitted to remain confidential until almost five years after those audits were performed. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
. of title 28 [i.e., the federal-question statute] to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter [i.e., subchapter II, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
In Doe v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 8:28 pm
Thorsten BauschPart II (- sorry, this will be a bit longer, but a lot has accumulated recently…) How does the EPO in 2018 fare with regard to the criterion “expert, well supported and motivated staff”? [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:00 am
Does my opponent try cases? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:57 am
" The question becomes, does this refer to the policy of not having open files or does it refer to the court's finding that the prosecutors in this case failed to ferret out every last possible Brady issue in their file and turn it over? [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
” Fisher II does not challenge the Ten Percent Plan but only the slight thumb on the scale for African Americans in the holistic review process, a thumb that yields, at most, one percent of the entering class that is black – at most, because some African Americans would succeed in holistic review regardless of their race because they are excellent debaters, violinists, or lacrosse stars. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm
In addition, I review two recent disciplinary decisions. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:11 am
Sachs of Fenwick & West LLP; Read Part I Yes, I said that: the Court does not understand the nature of patent law—more precisely, it does not understand what claims do. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:21 am
” G.S. 7B-101(1)(ii)d. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 12:29 am
The regulation of such content begs the question: can moderation be justified where the content, by its nature, does not meet the criminal standard? [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 2:15 am
In furtherance of that goal, the statute prohibits use of: (i) a sending domain name without the permission of the domain’s owner; (ii) From Names and domain names that misrepresent who an email is sent from; and (iii) statements in subject lines that are likely to deceive an email recipient as to the subject matter or contents of email advertisements. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
This is because, if “right and ability to control” requires an ISP to have “item-specific knowledge”, this appears to be the same knowledge required for and ISP to fall foul of Section 512(c)(1)(A)(i) and (ii). [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:58 am
For now, I prefer to focus on the second of these remedies – analogized to CRS technology in the 1990s – here; Professor Edelman not only explains proposed CRS-inspired regulation, but does so in effusive terms: A first insight comes from recognizing that regulators have already – successfully! [read post]
