Search for: "EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT" Results 501 - 520 of 22,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
AMI, along with a company Cohen formed to serve as a conduit for payments, falsified their own records to help Trump execute and hide what they did. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Richard Murphy
This “exhaustive examination” conclusively demonstrated that the President’s “executive power” must include a general authority to remove executive officials. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:15 am by John Jenkins
In turn, President Biden revoked that executive order on his first day in office. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:36 am by Bob Ambrogi
In pursuit of that mission, it is backed by an impressive founding team that includes Rebecca Sandefur, one of the world’s leading scholars on access to justice (who was on LawNext in 2020); Matthew Burnett, senior program officer for the Access to Justice Research Initiative at the American Bar Foundation (ABF); Jim Sandman, president emeritus of the Legal Services Corporation (on LawNext in 2019); and other notable names. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
They do not deny that the Presidency is an office or that the President is an officer. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
”) Colorado’s power to implement its duty to appoint presidential electors is undeniably self-executing, and Congress need not (indeed could not) do anything to facilitate or second-guess exercise of such state authority. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm by Mark Graber
Hale of New York agreed that the president was “the chief executive officer of the Government. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:08 pm by Populus Radio, Robert Ambrogi
  In pursuit of that mission, it is backed by an impressive founding team that includes Rebecca Sandefur, one of the world’s leading scholars on access to justice (who was on LawNext in 2020); Matthew Burnett, senior program officer for the Access to Justice Research Initiative at the American Bar Foundation (ABF); Jim Sandman, president emeritus of the Legal Services Corporation (on LawNext in 2019); and other notable names. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm by USPTO
Copyright Office to issue recommendations to the President on potential executive actions relating to copyright and AI, including addressing the scope of protection for works produced using AI and the treatment of copyrighted works in AI training.Today, based on the exceptional public feedback we’ve received, we announced our Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions in the Federal Register – the first of these directives. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am by Scott Bomboy
“It was a circuit court decision by a justice who, when he becomes a justice, writes in the Davis case, he assumed that Jefferson Davis would be ineligible to hold any office, particularly the presidency, and treated, and this is his words, as executing itself, needing no legislation on the part of Congress to give it effect. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
So why would conferring independence on officials within the executive branch whose sole responsibility is to adjudicate disputes between an agency’s enforcement arm and a private party infringe on the President’s duty to take care that the laws are faithfully executed? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Daniel J. Gilman
I would also highlight a critical letter to President Joe Biden from, among others, former secretaries of the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Justice Jackson might well decide that the "officer" language in Section 3 encompasses the President. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Biden’s record in office demonstrates that fact.He may sometimes forget, or confuse, names or dates, but as a memo written last year by Biden’s doctor flatly states, the President is a “healthy, vigorous, 80-year-old male, who is fit to successfully execute duties of the presidency. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:58 am by Josh Blackman
Or maybe the Chief will save Trump by holding that the President is actually a tax. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm by Josh Blackman
In contrast, at this juncture, the appointment of "executive branch officers" "inhered in the 'Executive rights'" of the "National Executive. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:11 am by Andrew Weissmann
This may be because of a poorly worded (we’re being charitable) thesis sentence on page 1 of Hur’s executive summary. [read post]
Justice Neil Gorsuch asked Mitchell to explain the “gap” in the terms “officer” and “officer of the United States” as they appear in the Constitution, which laid the foundation for one of Mitchell’s core arguments: that under Section 3, the office of the president is not explicitly listed as being required to follow its requirements, so the presidency is exempt. [read post]