Search for: "English v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 6,398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:50 am
In a previous post I erroneously stated that the appeal of Canwest Mediaworks Publications v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 10:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
Therefore, the state can distribute math, science, history, and English textbooks to all schools whether run by secular or religious entities. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews Monday’s oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am by Nicholas Round (Bristows)
On 16 March 2023, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by CMS
This case has already received attention in the media, with many stating that this could become the highest-value divorce case in English legal history. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:25 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Jalla v Shell International Trading and Shipping Co Limited [2023] UK SC 16] [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Ellena Erskine
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by INFORRM
The case will be of interest to anyone thinking about the complex relationship between defamation, privacy and data protection in English law. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Section 9 provides that: The section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled (a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
On 12 October 2010 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights, presided over by English judge Sir Nicholas Bratza, gave judgment in the Article 10 case of Saaristo v Finland. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 12:53 pm
There's a fight about the degree to which Section 14201 of the Elections Code requires the California Secretary of State to post facsimile ballot materials in languages other than English. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 1:24 am by Tobias Lutzi
In Lubbe v Cape, Connelly v RTZ and Vedanta, the English courts accepted jurisdiction, acknowledging that the absence of a means of funding or experienced lawyers to handle the case in a host state will lead to a real risk of the non-availability of substantial justice. [read post]