Search for: "English v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 6,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2017, 10:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
Therefore, the state can distribute math, science, history, and English textbooks to all schools whether run by secular or religious entities. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:50 am
In a previous post I erroneously stated that the appeal of Canwest Mediaworks Publications v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews Monday’s oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am by Nicholas Round (Bristows)
On 16 March 2023, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Ellena Erskine
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by INFORRM
The case will be of interest to anyone thinking about the complex relationship between defamation, privacy and data protection in English law. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 7:32 am by CMS
This case has already received attention in the media, with many stating that this could become the highest-value divorce case in English legal history. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:25 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Jalla v Shell International Trading and Shipping Co Limited [2023] UK SC 16] [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 12:53 pm
There's a fight about the degree to which Section 14201 of the Elections Code requires the California Secretary of State to post facsimile ballot materials in languages other than English. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Section 9 provides that: The section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled (a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]