Search for: "Entertainment Holdings, LLC"
Results 501 - 520
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2011, 9:20 am
Books would attract investment of authors’ labor and publishers’ capital on a colossal scale, and our libraries and bookstores would fill with works that educated and entertained a thriving nation. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 5:25 am
Copyright © 2007-2016 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:49 am
Dirty World Entertainment Recordings, LLC, 2013 WL 4068780 (E.D. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:31 am
In a similar case, Darnaa LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:31 am
In a similar case, Darnaa LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:23 am
Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 113C-3511301, filed by Penrod International LLC. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Yita, No. 23-494 This case arises from inter partes review proceedings initiated by Yita LLC challenging the MacNeil IP LLC’s U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
In a case decided last week, the First Court of Appeals in Houston entertained a challenge on the basis of “gross mistake”, and rejected it on the merits. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Dow AgroSciences LLC, 728 F.3d 1324, 1330-31 (Fed. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
By Joy P. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 837 F.3d 918, 932 (8th Cir. 2016) (finding viable FDCPA claims based on amounts "misstated by $1.29, $1.84, and $0.65" because "there [i]s no de minimis exception to FDCPA liability based upon low dollar amounts").[4]FULL TEXT OF DISSENTING OPINION STEPHEN A. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
paid $18.25 million to resolve allegations that it invited customers and prospective customers to lavish all-expense-paid sporting, entertainment, and recreational events to generate s [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Entertainment Inc. (7th Cir.) [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:24 pm
(US), LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
. * Vynamic, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 11:05 am
We find, based on the ample evidence in this record, that NIGGA does not function to identify Applicant as the sole source of clothing bearing the word …, and we further hold that the refusal to register did not violate the First Amendment because it did not discriminate against the message conveyed by the proposed mark…. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
Prestige Entertainment (C.D. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Gaito Architecture, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(ITC Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D Florida on motions to stay pending re-examination: Fusilamp LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:02 am
The Ninth Circuit’s holding is consistent with longstanding business practices. [read post]
