Search for: "FLOWERS v. FLOWERS" Results 501 - 520 of 1,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am by Jon Penney
  Is there any evidence that over the 12 years, during the flowering of the so-called surveillance state, Americans have become less politically active? [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:55 am by Liisa Speaker
Certainly, there is unpublished case law on that point, See, e.g., Vial v Flowers (Docket 332549, issued Sept 27, 2016), and Roguska v Roguska(Docket 291352, issued Sept 29, 2009). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:38 am by Conrad B. Wilton
”  If this were not the case, the Court noted an artist could monopolize images of geese flying in a “V” as they migrate, a mother duck leading ducklings out of a pond, a hummingbird hovering over a flower as it sucks its nectar, bats hanging upside down in cave, and countless other scenes commonly found in nature. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:04 pm
This is essentially the issue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had to address in Sekmadienis v Lithuania (Appl No 69317/14). [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 2:15 pm by The Regulatory Review
Yams belong the genus Dioscorea and are native to Asia and Africa, while sweet potatoes belong in the genus Ipomoea with flowering morning glory and derive originally from South America. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 5:16 am
I'm noticing the BRIEF FOR CAKE ARTISTS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY (PDF) in the pending Supreme Court case — Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]