Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2009, 6:47 pm
Homebuyers' rights under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) prohibit any type of kickback or fee-splitting arising from settlement services regardless of whether the homebuyers were overcharged the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently ruled in Carter v Welles-Bowen Realty, Inc, No 07-3965 (6th Cir, January 23, 2009). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
Author informationTrevor CutaiarAssociate at Mouledoux, Bland, Legrand & BrackettTrevor Cutaiar represents employers and insurance carriers in the areas of Admiralty & Maritime Law, federal workers' compensation and General Casualty & Insurance Defense. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:40 pm
” The case is United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
“An Act to provide for the valuation of lands and dwelling-houses, and the enumeration of slaves, within the United States. [read post]
4 May 2018, 8:01 am
For example, in Terra Nova Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
That is what happened in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
United States, 132 S. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:13 am
El Paso Co., 682 F.2d 530 (5th Cir. 1982); See also, Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:41 pm
Haro v Sebelius, ___F.3d____, No. 11-16606, 2013 WL 4734032, Decided Sept.4, 2013.Read prior posting about this case: Federal Court Enjoins CMS From MSP Recovery Procedures May 18, 2011 Haro v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:36 pm
Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau, Oregon Federal District Court Cause No. 3:11-cv-01493, Opinion and Order on Summary Judgment (February 4, 2013) (Dkt. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am
At a federal level, the U.S has specifically avoided the issue. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 1:53 pm
United States v Google LLC, 20-cv-3010 (APM) (D.D.C. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” United Mine Workers v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 7:29 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, issued an opinion on October 13, 2011, that is insightful for understanding at least one way of beating the appraisal clause. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:50 pm
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 6:23 am
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
