Search for: "Feldman v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
Feldman was the first federal court ruling to break with other federal tribunals on the same-sex marriage question. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:12 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:51 pm
Feldman adds that “some speculated” that Kennedy’s liberal vote in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
At Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman analyzes Wednesday’s oral argument in the patent case Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas Judge Lesa Gelb spoke of the issue in the case of Mangan v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm by Law Lady
The district court treated the suit as a collateral attack on the state court’s judgment and dismissed for want of jurisdiction, invoking the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:15 am by Amy Howe
In his column for Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses yesterday’s grant in EEOC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:24 pm by Lyle Denniston
” HIs opinion likened a state ban on same-sex marriage to the kind of state ban on mixed-race marriages that the Supreme Court struck down in 1967, in Loving v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 11:20 am by Schachtman
Realizing its error, the Court attempted to correct itself a short two years later, but probably only managed to make things worse, in Feldman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
On Wednesday, Federal District Judge Martin Feldman upheld the Louisiana ban in Robicheaux v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:05 am by Lyle Denniston
Feldman thus became the first by a federal court to reject a constitutional challenge since the Justices’ decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 4:37 pm
The 6th Circuit still leaves the courts looking into the minds of religionists and assessing the religiosity of their motivations, when it would be better to be "done with this business of judicially examining other people's faiths" (to quote the last line of my all-time favorite judicial opinion, Justice Jackson dissenting in United States v. [read post]