Search for: "GAMBLE v. GAMBLE" Results 501 - 520 of 2,387
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
Third, and even more controversially, the Opinion explained in a footnote that even a sealed indictment is a no-no; the risk of a leak “take[s] an unacceptable gamble with fundamental constitutional values. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Procter &Gamble Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:43 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The facts of this case are somewhat unusual, involving a professional gambling business. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:43 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The facts of this case are somewhat unusual, involving a professional gambling business. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:45 am
 The decisionThe Board first noted that for a sign to possess distinctive character, it must serve to identify the goods and services in respect of which registration is sought as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish those goods and services from those of other undertakings (C-473/01 P, Procter & Gamble v OHIM). [read post]