Search for: "Grant v. People"
Results 501 - 520
of 16,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 1:24 pm
Flood Control Dist. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 1:23 pm
And the California Court of Appeal has been light.But today nonetheless grants us an opportunity to look at how condo development sometimes works. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:44 am
For most people, that means going to the Appellate Division, and then asking the State Court of Appeals to take up the case, which it can reject without comment because the State's highest court can pick and chose what cases it wants to hear. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Abarca (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 475, 481–482, review granted October 19, 2016, S237106 [same]; People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:02 am
Garcia v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 8:23 am
I first blogged the case in 2013 when the lower court granted Yelp’s anti-SLAPP motion; I also blogged it in 2014 when the appellate court reversed the anti-SLAPP motion. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 10:44 am
People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:14 am
In Cole v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:18 am
Doron Dorfman Braidwood v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
The right to counsel may not just be a right that people watch on television shows, but one that all people, rich or poor, are granted. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:39 am
His motion should be GRANTED. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:02 pm
Not surprisingly, some people blog about it. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
In People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
The third granted case, Renico v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:48 am
Most often, people think of injunctions or restraining orders as being granted when a paramour physically attacks his love interest. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to amend… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898,… [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
During 2010, the California Supreme Court granted review in the Court of Appeal cases of Howell v. [read post]
