Search for: "Green v. Smith"
Results 501 - 520
of 764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Kentucky v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am
Davey Smith, D. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
Id. at *1-2That’s one.Next, in Green v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:11 pm
” Jessica Smith, North Carolina Crimes 300 (6th ed. 2007). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:41 am
On the second day of trial, Appellant filed a motion for sanctions based upon the State’s failure to provide the defense with access to a blue-green bottle shown in the prosecution photos. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am
Smith Yesterday’s post explored the economic intrusiveness of income verification via Alphonse Fletcher’s attempt to buy a fifth apartment in New York City’s Dakota co-operative, and the New York Times‘s salacious reportage about the board’s decision to deny the application based (they said) on their doubts about his financial wherewithal. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:21 am
Jenna Greene reports on the dynamics of a possible wide-ranging probe. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 2:07 pm
In Green v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am
Today, March 24, is the centennial of the date on which the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ives v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
., Hale v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Kan. 2002) (acknowledging that most courts require a showing of RR > 2, but questioning their reasoning), aff’d, 356 F. 3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Smith v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
and serial MARQUES activists Adrian Smith and David Stone. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Over the last few months, we here at Abnormal Use have corresponded regularly with our friends at the Drug and Device Law blog, most notably Steve McConnell and Jim Beck, about both the law and popular culture. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 2:45 pm
The next February, Griffin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:16 am
” Green v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm
” [via LexisOne] (still working on) Billy Dale Green v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:07 am
Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in Abdullah al-Kidd v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
As for the application for a declaration, this had already been made in Smith v Scott and therefore there was nothing of additional practical use which granting a declaration would serve. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am
Relatedly, compare the treatment of imitative trade dress to “compare to Brand X” messages—courts are not suspicious of the latter on trademark grounds and haven’t been since Smith v. [read post]
