Search for: "HOWE v. MARTIN" Results 501 - 520 of 2,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2010, 9:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In a piece titled Green-tech patent program off target pace , Martin LaMonica begins:A trial program meant to speed the pace of innovation in green technology hasn't unleashed the torrent of activity as hoped.Launched in December, the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:49 pm by Law Office of Ava George Stewart, P.C.
That’s the question that the Illinois Supreme Court answered in People v Martin, No. 109102, 2011 WL 1499909 (Ill Sup Ct).From People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:51 am by Marvin Ammori
At least, that's the effect if the Obama FCC continues to follow the legal framework adopted under the Bush administration--a framework that requires the FCC to play football with a tennis racket, a framework for authority that the DC Circuit just beat to death, shot, and then drowned.From my point of view, I was reminded of my friend Larry Lessig's classic article, "How I Lost the Big One," where he said he wished he could go back in time and argue differently an… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
But if one believes in the how the Patent System has foste [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 5:33 pm by Amy Howe
United States, which they added to their docket for the 2024-25 term on Jan. 17, and Christopher Mills to argue in Martin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 1:59 pm
So I take out a loan application and, where it asks for my name, I write "Shaun Pat Martin," even though my middle name is actually "Patrick". [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:16 am
"State senators who remain supporters of the death penalty, starting with their way-too-long-time president, Thomas V. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:44 am by Charles Sartain
Then your handiwork won’t be disparaged as “opaquely worded” “cryptic language”, suffering from “lack of accuracy and lack of clarity”, and “containing grammatical and logical errors”, as in the case of an oil and gas lease considered in Martin v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am by Stephen Page
Item (A) for decision is as to who should be the trustees to be appointed under Section 66G; item (B) is how should the jewellery be sold; item (C) is how should the costs of the present application be borne; and item (D) is what is the appropriate form of the orders. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:33 am by Howard Wasserman
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]