Search for: "Hammers v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 863
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Stuart said he would show us how Chief Justice Roberts maneuvered, and many are praising him, saying that this is what John Marshall did in Marbury v Madison. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Tobias Thienel
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 4:23 am
The AmeriKat has been missing her home state of late - the cool desert night breezes, the unbearably hot midday sun, the rumbling thunderstorms and the green chile. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Could be viewed as a hammer on which to challenge constitutionality: there is a penalty for asserting right to jury trial. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:34 pm by David Bernstein
Imagine, for example, if the ghost of Justice William Day, author of Hammer v. [read post]