Search for: "Harper v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2008, 2:37 pm
Rainsford v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
Div. 1981); State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 10:47 am
The one case that will be reheard because of the court order is Harper v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
Harper, 96 N.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
Harper, 96 N.C. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:44 am
Harper. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Harper v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Harper v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
The book points out that neither the Federalist nor other early commentaries used the word “interposition” and that the term did not even surface in state protests against Chisholm v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
Harper, the petitioners argue that state courts and executive officials have no power to apply state voting laws and constitutions and that the exclusive decision maker for federal elections must be state legislators. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm
Duffy’s appeal is based on the loss of Senate immunity if it has engaged in wrongdoing, as the Senate did, he says, in taking its direction from the executive (Prime Minister Stephen Harper). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
On July 2, 2015, in Glatt v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
On July 2, 2015, in Glatt v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
"In Collins v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 9:55 am
Calendar notice. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 7:44 am
McCord Election Law Oral Argument in Moore v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:48 pm
” The complaint in the new case, Bickerton v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:39 am
For the first factor, the district court quote Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
