Search for: "Herring v. Reed"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,096
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
In the following guest post, Dennis Klein of the Hughes Hubbard & Reed law firm provides an overview of what he views as the takeaways for corporate directors and officers from the financial crisis D&O litigation. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
In the case of Daniels v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:16 pm
Feb. 19, 2016); Utech v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:10 pm
The defendant maintained the lower courts erred by ignoring the Legislature’s mandates, as well as the Court of Appeals decision in Reed v Reed, 265 Mich App 131 (2005). [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 9:30 pm
Update: "People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, sorts out the issues involved in the battle between Apple and the government, in light of all the circumstances, including the February 29, 2016 opinion by Eastern District of New York Judge James Orenstein in the separate Apple iPhone unlocking case. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:29 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Reed v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 12:01 pm
King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Reed. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:23 am
The Supreme Court confirmed that “safety is to be levelled upwards” (per Lord Reed and Lord Hodge at paragraph 76). [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 2:28 am
Lord Reed and Lord Hodge also agreed that the Lord Ordinary was entitled to conclude the respondent was negligent in failing to provide Ms Kennedy with the attachments and that this failure caused or materially contributed to her accident. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:30 am
Pryor II v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:13 am
Reed, 135 S. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
A sizeable estate permits adequate compensation, but nothing beyond that (Martin v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Specifically, the supervisor allegedly said the housekeeper was too “mannish” and that the supervisor didn’t want to work with her because she “acted too manly” (Reed v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently released its decision in the case ofIn re: Henry Riley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:45 am
Specifically, the supervisor allegedly said the housekeeper was too “mannish” and that the supervisor didn’t want to work with her because she “acted too manly” (Reed v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
This case involves an Alabama woman who won adoption of her same-sex partner’s three kids in Georgia, only to have her home state’s supreme court hold that the Georgia courts had erred in applying its own state adoption law. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Valentino v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
Mrs Arnold (the lessor) argued that the service charge clauses should be interpreted such that the lessees were obliged to pay a fixed yearly amount, increasing at the fixed compound rate of 10% per annum, irrespective of the actual cost to her of providing repair and maintenance work. [read post]
