Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 501 - 520 of 3,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
Madigan based his analysis on unproven assumptions, rendering his methodology unreliable. [read post]
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:41 pm by Francis Pileggi
Invoking the principles articulated in USA Cafes, the Court of Chancery recently held that a controller cannot use its control over an entity to advantage himself at the expense of the controlled entity. 77 Charters, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:59 am by Ronald Mann
GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is a bit different from the typical Supreme Court arbitration case. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Review, Evan Seeman looks at the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am by David Kris
The executive branch believes that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) does not apply to otherwise-authorized, military cyber activity, and the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on the CFAA in Van Buren v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
But the First Amendment is quite clear that a state may enforce a neutral law of general applicability in Employment Div. v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 5:17 pm by Peter Mahler
The Company The above-described scenario played out in a lawsuit captioned Magarik v Kraus USA, Inc. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The judgment directly concerns the legality of standard contractual clauses in the context of transfers of personal data to the USA. [read post]