Search for: "Howe v. Nelson"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,073
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
”Amedisys’s petition to the Supreme Court emphasized how it believes the Fifth Circuit’s whole-greater-than-the-parts theory got it wrong. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:31 am
Allison, Carr v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:09 am
At Balkinization, Nelson Tebbe discusses Monday’s denial of certiorari in Bronx Household of Faith v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
Corey Brettschneider & Nelson TebbeLast week, the Court heard arguments in Walker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 10:29 am
It compared the case to Locke v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
(citing and quoting Soldo v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
As I have argued elsewhere, [3] IP laws are deliberate government interventions in the market to try to shape how people participate in that market, encouraging new creation by rewarding it with above-market returns and discouraging imitation by imposing damages or even barring it altogether.Once we understand IP laws as government social policies that seek to alter market outcomes, we can start to think of those laws as part of a broader tapestry of government rules that affect… [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:15 am
Nelson, supra.State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Stancil v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:36 am
Flex-A-Seal v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 3:30 am
"There is an excerpt from They Know Everything About You: How Data-Collecting Corporations and Snooping Government Agencies Are Destroying Democracy by Robert Scheer (Nation) in Salon.Margaret Jacobs discusses her new book, A Generation Removed: The Fostering and Adoption of Indigenous Children in the Post-War World (University of Nebraska Press), with New Books in American Studies.The Guardian reviews The End of Apartheid: Diary of a Revolution by Robin… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:52 am
The latter book describes how a number of citizens groups are trying to get an Article V convention, coming to several conclusions: Congress will never voluntarily call a convention no matter how many petitions are received, because a convention might propose amendments which would decrease the powers or prerogatives of Congress. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am
Nelson argued for a 25% DLOM based on restricted stock studies and case precedent. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:39 am
The case, Nelson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 11:56 am
Nelson that “based upon” does not necessarily “require that each and every element of a claim be commercial activity by a foreign state. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
Nelson. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
App’x 371, 381 (6th Cir. 2001); Nelson v. [read post]
