Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys"
Results 501 - 520
of 760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 6:50 am
In this week’s case (Plishka-Humphreys v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am
Fischer (2005, 2011) Thinking Like a Writer: A Lawyer’s Guide to Writing and Editing, by Steven V. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:51 pm
In my post of October 27, 2011, entitled A Section 1983 Primer (5): Statutes of Limitations, I blogged about statutes of limitations in section 1983 cases. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:39 am
That issue brought about a slugfest in the Second Circuit last week.The case is Poventud v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
Humphrey and Legislative Assistant to Senator Wayne L. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
S. 356, 363 (2006) (“[W]e are not bound to follow our dicta in a prior case in which the point now at issue was not fully debated”); Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
Indeed, in 2011, this favoritism policy was the cornerstone of the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:36 am
Yet, in Humphrey v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:36 am
Yet, in Humphrey v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
Since its 2002 landmark decision in Atkins v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 10:34 am
In Farmer v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Throughout 2012, Seyfarth Shaw LLP’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group hosted a series of CLE webinars that addressed significant issues facing clients today in this important and ever changing area of law. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Throughout 2012, Seyfarth Shaw LLP’s dedicated Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group hosted a series of CLE webinars that addressed significant issues facing clients today in this important and ever changing area of law. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 10:43 am
Os que vêem as coisas de forma diferente. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
Touchstone Television Productions v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:39 am
Humphreys School of Law) has posted The Great and Powerful Oz Revealed: The Ethics and Wisdom of the Scotus Leaks in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
