Search for: "I. S. T. v. R. W. B."
Results 501 - 520
of 1,179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Hard to get consumers to care about artist-owned services, and part of that is that artists make it hard for audiophiles to buy the highest quality FLAC; it’s so much easier to use Spotify.Annemarie Bridy: Tussle b/t Spotify and Apple re: antitrust w/r/t in-app purchases. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
First Letter Last Name Division / Judge Floor Courtroom G, 0, S, U Division A — Greco 2nd 20 B, F, P Division B — Myers 1st Floor 12 D, M, N, X, Y Division C — Farr 2nd 24 C, K, R Division D — Lefler 2nd 23 H, L, W Division E — Taylor 2nd… [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
(Congratulations to Stephen R. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
Recall that the district court had made the factual finding that LPL’s firing of Bennie wasn’t caused by the regulators’ actions, and the court of appeals concluded that this finding wasn’t clearly erroneous. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm
Comm’r of Ed. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
Defendant replied, `I'll add him. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
Citizens United was represented by Theodore B. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:30 am
[But that presupposes a commercial/noncommercial distinction which he opposes, not to mention I wonder about materiality v. puffery status of picture of girl w/r/t consumer decisionmaking.] [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am
It’s not b/c commercial speech isn’t as valuable, it’s b/c they don’t like the message being sent. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
What motivates consumers w/r/t specific features versus entire collection of features/general reputation? [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:13 pm
The key is the non-reputation-related disadvantage, to distinguish b/t I want this b/c it looks nice and b/c I like the TM owner. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
We have no idea how to apply these rules w/r/t shape marks. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Europe has a problem w/that b/c we haven’t recognized that something might have just gotten over the line of protectability when we later analyze its scope. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
And here is our reply to that: B. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:38 am
Webb v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
R. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:25 pm
Kennedy: Dignity or liberty enhancing: I can speak b/c of who I am, like Kennedy thinks in Lawrence or Obergefell: liberty interests have nothing to do w/anyone else. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
Silbey: one of the productive comparisons b/t Anita Allen’s and other work was that Allen discussed harm to individuals v. harm to systems or organizations. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
WINN v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm
W/r/t meaningful opposition—just a filing of an opposition shouldn’t immediately kick people back into the regular process. [read post]
