Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL" Results 501 - 520 of 15,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Richard Re
Please check out the article if you're curious about the full argument. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
The rule rejects the result in In re Sealed Case, 877 F.2d 976 (D.C.Cir. 1989), which held that inadvertent disclosure of documents during discovery automatically constituted a subject matter waiver. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:33 am by Steve Hall
"We're confident we'll get a ruling in our favor and the hearing will continue," said Bob Loper, one of Green's attorneys. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:11 am by Greg Lambert
And so I just kind of had to just make it up as I went, which I’m still doing today, I take a very much a startup mindset of continuing to build the ship as I sail it, and sort of continue to adapt as we go. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am by Schachtman
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923)). [10]  In re Zyprexa Prod. [read post]
   Many will have to re-assess the weekly hours worked for all of their employees in order to determine how many of their previously exempt employees now qualify for overtime based on the Final Rule. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm by Jenna Greene
“How do you come up with a lower number when you’re expanding the universe? [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Lee Tankle
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently re-affirmed the principle that in order to have an enforceable non-compete agreement in Pennsylvania, the agreement must be supported by adequate consideration and that a statement merely agreeing to be “legally bound” doesn’t meet that requirement. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 12:51 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
If President Trump is re-elected it is certain he will continue to pursue the rescission of DACA leaving the fate of Dreamers to Congress. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:19 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Controlled Substances Act, ensuring compliance while still making a profit continues to be something of a puzzle. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 7:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
 The final judgment rule is strong and – in most cases – bars any re-judgment even when post-judgment events & revelations would impact the outcome. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm by Reference Staff
As their website says: “Whether you’re a lawyer or law student, or you’re just here for the messy legal drama, Strict Scrutiny has you covered. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:24 am by Bob Ambrogi
The Legaltech Week panel of journalists is joined this week by Rohan Pavuluri, cofounder and CEO of bankruptcy platform Upsolve, to discuss his recent article arguing that rules prohibiting the unauthorized practice of law — rules that he says give lawyers a monopoly on providing legal services — effectively work to promote racial inequality. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm by Amy Howe
When Brnovich countered that the Biden administration could have continued to defend the rule, Barrett pushed back. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:51 am
Texas "misguided," declaring that their interpretation "fail[ed] to disturb the basic legal principle that continues to govern such cases. [read post]