Search for: "In Re Good News Publishers, Inc." Results 501 - 520 of 1,474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2017, 4:57 am
Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers, 2015. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:14 pm by Robin Shea
He is reportedly divesting holdings in CKE Restaurants, Inc., to avoid a conflict of interest. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
 Most of the time, they’re waging a desperate struggle to stay afloat. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Prawfsblawg, Richard Re discusses the court’s recent decision in Lightfoot v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Right to a Good (Business) Reputation and Truth: Re-Examining the Declaration of Falsity, Gary K. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:57 am by David Post
It would be surprising if it were otherwise, of course; after all, the whole point of these fan films is to re-interpret and modify the original stories, bending them into new shapes, to tell new stories involving these characters wearing these uniforms in these settings. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: As far as I can recall, in modern times there has been only one other collection of essays devoted to the judiciary and business and published as a book: “Economic Liberties and the Judiciary,” which was edited by James Dorn and Henry Manne and accompanied by a foreword by Judge Alex Kozinski. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Burr’s endorsement of a blockade comes from the editorial boards of the Capitol Broadcasting Company, the Raleigh News & Observer, and the Greensboro News & Record. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:41 pm by Camille Ochoa
If elected officials decide to approve the new surveillance technology, the police must adopt, obtain approval of, and publish clearly defined use policies that remove ambiguity and subjective interpretation. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:56 pm by Schachtman
In yet another law review article on Daubert, Susan Haack has managed mostly to repeat her past mistakes, while adding a few new ones to her exegesis of the law of expert witnesses. [read post]