Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel"
Results 501 - 520
of 893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
On the other hand, Médecins Sans Frontières noted that '[t]he Supreme Court's decision now makes patents on the medicines that we desperately need less likely. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
Rather, the question before the 16-member panel was whether widespread PSA testing saves enough lives to justify the considerable medical fallout — including loss of urinary control and impotence — to men whose lives are not saved by the test. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 14-181Issue: Whether the Second Circuit – in a two-to-one panel decision that disregarded the considered opinion advanced by the United States as amicus – erred in holding that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) preempts Vermont's health care database law as applied to the third-party administrator for a self-funded ERISA plan. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm
Uhrich's academic talk was nonjudgmental, so when you find words like "good news" and "bad news" here, rest assured they're just my opinion. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:22 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
Her essays have appeared in numerous literary anthologies, including The Best American Nonrequired Reading and The Best Creative Nonfiction, as well as literary journals such as the Seneca Review and The Believer. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
Accordingly, we grant the petition for review in this case, and without hearing oral argument, TEX. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:00 am
So we're awfully glad you're here. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:56 am
The current execution team at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility near Lucasville includes emergency medical technicians. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am
Weed, “Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Methods,” 25 Risk Analysis 1545 (2005) (noting the vague, ambiguous, indefinite nature of the concept of “weight of evidence” review); R.G. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:50 am
A panel of fellow experts (The Back Bench) add to Gerry's reviews with pithy remarks. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:08 am
" (We're definitely through the looking glass, now.) [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:30 pm
No need, says two-thirds of a Seventh Circuit panel. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Each patient’s case must be reviewed by a panel of doctors and other staff — similar to how complex cancer cases are evaluated. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
In addition, Prade was seen accessing Margo’s medical office at night. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:59 pm
Review time-lines are uncertain. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Hannington 13-92Issue: Whether there can be an exception to the deferential arbitrary and capricious standard of review not previously recognized by this Court when an ERISA plan fiduciary interprets plan terms which refer to outside materials. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Since February 2013, when you’re filing any type of medical negligence case, you must—not “should” or “ought to” or “should consider”—must include a certificate of merit. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:50 am
Medical experts have long debated whether these products are truly necessary for everyday consumer use. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:01 am
If an entity performs medical diagnoses reliably enough, it's intelligent enough to be a good diagnostician, whether it is a human being or a computer. [read post]
