Search for: "In re: Peer Review Action." Results 501 - 520 of 926
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In that spirit, section I begins by briefly reviewing two relatively new writing books focused on writing well in an information-saturated world. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 11:27 am by Elliot Harmon
If the claimant doesn’t take action against you in a federal court in 14 days, your content is restored. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:40 am by SHG
…each guideline Jobe referenced had not been scientifically proven with control groups or peer reviewed to give them legitimacy, Baer said. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:58 am
May 31, 2011) (“recognizing a medical peer review privilege in a FTCA action” in light of PSQIA); KD, 715 F. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 10:09 am
This is where the periodic reviews of the scorecard comes in handy. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Petition for review after the court of appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
`The proper inquiry is whether [the challenged action] violated the Fourth Amendment rights of [the] criminal defendant making the challenge. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Nonprofit, mission of bringing context and perspective to today’s news by re-reporting and re-analyzing older stories to see their continuing relevance. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:21 am by Adam Steinbaugh
"   A subsequent post by Old Dominion's president noted (vaguely) that the "incident will be reviewed immediately by those on campus empowered to do so" and that "[a]ny student found to have violated the code of conduct will be subject to disciplinary action. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:11 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Yet we have not seen significant growth in the illegal sharing of peer-reviewed academic articles. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs found corroboration in the criticisms of several peer reviewers. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
 Internet Policy Review, Journal on Internet Regulation, Vol. 4, [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
They cited a number of peer-reviewed studies to this effect, which experts in the field allegedly deemed to be appropriate proxies for users. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:14 am by SHG
 The only place I’ve seen that range used is in the The Voice article which, as I’ve previously discussed, isn’t exactly peer-reviewed research. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:05 am by Schachtman
Their blog’s coverage of error, fraud, plagiarism, and other publishing disasters is often first-rate, and a valuable curative for the belief that peer review publication, as it is now practiced, ensures trustworthiness. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am by Schachtman
The Court, however, continued to allow some proxies for that warrant, in the form of “general acceptance,” or “peer review. [read post]
31 May 2015, 7:44 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 The informational support creates idiosyncratic learning through peer exchange. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:56 am by Andres
The Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, David Anderson QC, has conducted an independent review of the operation and regulation of investigatory powers, with specific reference to the interception of communications and communications data. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:29 am by Don Cruse
The Court focused its analysis on an exception in the statute: If a judge makes a preliminary finding that a proceeding or record of a medical peer review committee or a communication made to the committee is relevant to an anticompetitive action, or to a civil rights proceeding brought under 42 U.S.C. [read post]