Search for: "In re Brady" Results 501 - 520 of 965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2009, 8:00 am
 With a long history in law enforcement - prosecuting violent crime under Morgenthau, investigating police abuses during the Diallo era, successfully fighting to expand DNA testing and restrict felons' access to handguns (the Brady Bill) and helping large law enforcement agencies re-tool themselves to prevent crime and root out corruption, I am well-prepared to build an innovative District Attorney's office that keeps us safe without devastating entire… [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
So, while the program may provide a real lifeline for many borrowers, companies need to understand that there are uncertainties that could come back to bite them – and that, as always, a little healthy skepticism is appropriate when somebody says “we’re from the government, and we’re here to help. [read post]
16 May 2020, 3:55 am by SHG
Notably, while exculpatory evidence falls within the overall ambit of Brady material, which the prosecution is theoretically required to disclose, Brady is a far broader concept than just exculpatory material. [read post]
4 May 2018, 3:46 am by SHG
They’re supported by serious reformers. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Sullivan: Sponsorship serves a purpose, but we’re assuming it’s an ad. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
Or sixths, if we’re talking about Friedman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
Cain, 14-10008 (seventh) asks questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel; Taylor v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Mike Ostermeyer works in the Milwaukee office of Quarles & Brady. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:30 am by Kevin
All we’re saying is that … the same rule applies to Rule 48(a) if we have brought the charge…. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
This same court case re-emphasizes the nauseating Virginia rule that: "'There is no general constitutional right to discovery in a criminal case.' Spencer v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm by Steve Kalar
   And if your client is the target of cooperation (and you’re skeptical of the government’s Brady / Giglio compliance), worry about what the Judiciary’s good-hearted efforts to protect cooperators will mean for your efforts to investigate the government’s witnesses against your client. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:35 am by Andrew Delaney
From there it’s up to the agency to determine if they’re public documents or not. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:19 pm
I don’t care if you’re the Brady Bunch or that prototypically dysfunctional family, money seems to have a way of bringing out the worst in people. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
A day in the life of a Kat:from Playboy bunny to ...In late 2017 The IPKat reported that, after Europe, it appeared that the interplay between linking and copyright protection had re-surfaced also in the US [use of the term 're-surfaced' is justified in light of the fact that US courts have already had the chance to address these issues, eg in the well-known Perfect 10 case].After a few months, earlier this week two decisions have been issued on this matter ... with two… [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:22 pm
 See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 16; Brady v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:35 am by Andrew Delaney
From there it’s up to the agency to determine if they’re public documents or not. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm by Rumpole
We start week two 3-1 and a healthy 345 Bradys in the blue. [read post]