Search for: "In re Judge Russell" Results 501 - 520 of 785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2013, 4:50 am by Robichaud
[I]f you’re going to treat someone who is convicted in such a way as to allow them some time out of jail by way of granting parole, it seems to me it’s rather inequitable to say to someone who has not yet gone to trial that you get no similar credit for the fact that you’re sitting here day-after-day in jail. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 4:50 am by Robichaud
[I]f you’re going to treat someone who is convicted in such a way as to allow them some time out of jail by way of granting parole, it seems to me it’s rather inequitable to say to someone who has not yet gone to trial that you get no similar credit for the fact that you’re sitting here day-after-day in jail. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am by Mary Dwyer
 Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
  The district court tossed out the suit based on the FTCA’s discretionary function exception, and the First Circuit affirmed – with mainlander Judges Lynch and Howard in the majority and San Juan-based Judge Torruella dissenting “in the strongest of terms. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:59 pm by Rich Vetstein
Lowney in a Land Court “quiet title” action to re-claim her property back. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  (Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the petitioner in Pleau.) [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm by Kali Borkoski
§ 2254(d), that a defendant retains a constitutional right to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require re-appointment of counsel to file a new-trial motion. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm by Ben Cheng
 Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
In my view, the appellants are asking this court to re-examine all the evidence and to come to different conclusions than those reached by the trial judge – i.e., to retry the case. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:09 pm
He was charged before District Judge Tony Russell and was committed to Lancaster County Prison after failing to post $5,000 bail. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am by Rob Robinson
Federal Judge Shifts eDiscovery Cost in Potential Class Action - http://bit.ly/PBEZGU (Saranac Hale Spencer) Predictive Coding v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:10 am by Staci Zaretsky
Is that what you’re alleging? [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:10 am by Staci Zaretsky
Is that what you’re alleging? [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:44 am by Zoe Tillman
The majority found that Superior Court Judge Russell Canan correctly explained the standard for an OWI even if he gave the wrong explanation about its relationship with a DUI. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:56 am by Alfred Brophy
 Ann told me that she wrote it so that federal judges could understand feminist legal thought and why it matters. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am by Derek Dissinger
  Derek Dissinger is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
This would require, at a minimum: outlawing the concealing of evidence; re-training academics to teach law students techniques of finding the truth instead of mugging up a million ways to defeat it; dismantling the professional cartel by training judges separately from lawyers; appointing six times as many judges, on the basis of rigorous examinations, and giving them back control of the process; compelling lawyers and judges to take an oath to tell the truth;… [read post]