Search for: "In the Matter of Parker"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,579
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2019, 9:56 am
When Winning Matters Most, Call MyPhillyLawyer. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
appeared first on Parker and DuFresne Blog. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
Celgene shares fell 8% in a matter of hours. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Two years ago, the chief executive of Brown Parker & DeMarinis Advertising paused for a moment to look across the meeting room as he delivered a presentation. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:45 am
Parker v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:38 am
This may, in turn, entail extensive valuation analysis, and perhaps independent third-party consulting on the matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:47 am
”‘ (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II, LP., v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimp, LLP, 265 AD2d at 210.) [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
” Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:23 am
Parker MacIntyre provides legal and compliance services to investment advisers, broker-dealers, registered representatives, hedge funds, and issuers of securities, among others. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:42 am
To what extent do these differences matter to U.S. companies and researchers? [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:36 am
Parker Drilling Mgmt.Servs., Ltd., 881 F.3d 1078, 1083 (9th Cir. 2018). [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
When does a Tennessee court lose jurisdiction over a child-custody case? [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:45 am
appeared first on Parker and DuFresne Blog. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
“We always believed the State DEP was the most appropriate enforcement authority to address this matter and we know their latest actions are greeted with a certain sense of relief in the community at-large. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:24 am
In Parker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
However, this is not to say that federal courts never find standing over condemnation matters. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking for purely… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
DO JUDICIAL CHALLENGES TO TAKINGS STILL EXIST? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
