Search for: "J. DOE # 1"
Results 501 - 520
of 14,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2015, 7:06 am
Perrigo Company et al, 1-13-cv-00236 (DED January 6, 2015, Order) (Andrews, J.) [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
§ 381.986(1)(j)(5)(b). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:41 pm
District Judge William J. [read post]
1 May 2011, 6:39 am
February 14, 2011): B.Application of the Special Needs Test 1. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:19 pm
Morris, [1972] 1 W.L.R. 307, [1972] 1 All E.R. 960 at 971 (Ch.D., Megarry J.) said: … In this judgment I have referred to a number of authorities not cited in argument. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
He was however unsatisfied with the way of things, and said as much, giving two suggestions as to how the higher courts might address the matter:1. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
As of September 29, 2016: 132 people with hepatitis A have been reported from eight states: Arkansas (1), Maryland (12), New York (3), North Carolina (1), Oregon (1), Virginia (106), West Virginia (7), and Wisconsin (1). 52 ill people have been hospitalized. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
Unhelpfully, the CJEU has largely followed the AG on this answer, which does not expressly favour one of Arnold J's options over another. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
Nor does it follow that the test is a purely quantitative one. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
The Board does however not address the Guidelines, although that could have been expected in view of Art. 20(2) RPBA2020. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 12:33 pm
J. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:21 am
Written by Matthew Moore and Taline Sahakian Edited by Gary J. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
Infringement under Article 9(1)(a) [“double identity”: same mark, same goods and/or services]Here, Arnold J said, the burden is on the defendant to show the use does not affect or is not liable to affect the functions of the trade mark, and the DHL dictum makes sense. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:56 am
The use of a cover story for a stop to make it safer for officers does not prevent the use of the collective knowledge doctrine. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 12:39 pm
October 18, 2007)(Schneider, J.) dismissed the debtor's chapter 7 case as an "abuse" under section 707(b)(1) based on the "totality of the circumstances" test of section 707(b)(3). [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 7:10 am
That does not make the car a single invention. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:49 am
Bottom line: Infringement defendant Abbott wins; J&J (Centocor Ortho Biotech) andNew York University lose.Judge T. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:32 am
HemCon, Inc., 1-06-cv-00100 (NHD April 29, 2010, Order) (DiClerico, J.) [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
He made a similar point nearly seven years later: “On any view, the law regarding the openness of a financial remedy hearing which is not wholly or mainly about child maintenance is regrettably unclear and contradictory”: Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52, per Mostyn J at [80] (13 June 2022). [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:57 pm
Gabriel J. [read post]
