Search for: "JOINT FEE APPLICANTS"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2007, 11:37 am
`(g) The terms `joint inventor' and `coinventor' mean any 1 of the individuals who invented or discovered the subject matter of a joint invention. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
`(g) The terms `joint inventor' and `coinventor' mean any 1 of the individuals who invented or discovered the subject matter of a joint invention. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:38 am
`(g) The terms `joint inventor' and `coinventor' mean any 1 of the individuals who invented or discovered the subject matter of a joint invention. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:04 am
`(g) The terms `joint inventor' and `coinventor' mean any 1 of the individuals who invented or discovered the subject matter of a joint invention. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:40 pm
`(g) The terms `joint inventor' and `coinventor' mean any 1 of the individuals who invented or discovered the subject matter of a joint invention. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:14 am
The mother, however, demanded a jury trial and paid the associated fee. [read post]
15 May 2020, 5:08 am
The 0.5% guarantee fee charged by the National Treasury is the second loss buffer. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 11:19 am
A copy of the agreement of sale and preliminary settlement statement should be included with the Application for Tax Clearance Certificate. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:29 am
L&R ExplorationCitation: 2011 WY 134Docket Number: S-11-0037URL: http://wyomcases.courts.state.wy.us/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
., Appellee. 5th District.Attorney's fees -- Where condemning authority made pre-suit written offer to purchase parcel for a specified amount, “subject to all apportionment claims,” trial court erred in refusing to limit attorney's fees based on benefits obtained pursuant to section 73.092(1), Florida Statutes -- Section 73.015, Florida Statutes, the pre-suit offer statute, does not contemplate a separate offer to a fee owner for the value of his or… [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
March Joint Powers Authority (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1135, the court addressed whether the approval of a Design Plan Application was ministerial or discretionary. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:02 am
The appropriate course of action once Wolf Greenfield became aware of the conflicting instructions from its joint clients, Whitehead and Max-Planck, would have been to withdraw from the Tuschl I patent prosecution. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 7:00 am
Require joint notification of clients. [read post]
1 May 2017, 4:28 am
We are often asked to draft China employment contracts for WFOEs and Joint Ventures. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:48 am
Saving time and money: Resolving disputes through litigation can be time-consuming and expensive due to legal fees, court appearances, trial preparation, expert testimony requirements, and potential appeals. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 4:22 pm
It also concluded that societies benefitted greatly from the collaboration in research and development, which lead to IPR creations and new technologies and concluded that joint IP production was usually the result of research and development alliances. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 4:22 pm
It also concluded that societies benefitted greatly from the collaboration in research and development, which lead to IPR creations and new technologies and concluded that joint IP production was usually the result of research and development alliances. [read post]
12 May 2015, 9:00 am
Daily Activity (5/12/15) IN THE SENATE HB 4448 of 2015 Natural resources; inland lakes; inland lakes and streams application fees; modify. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:37 am
If not for Germany's "loser pays" rule for the allocation and potential recovery of fees, the system claim's fate wouldn't even matter.Niantic's counsel from Quinn Emanuel raised three claim construction arguments that are unavailing:The claim language refers to an application server and a correlation server. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 6:36 am
COF first asserted that Section 21167.3(e) of CEQA abrogated the applicability of the attorney-client and work product privileges to the letters. [read post]
