Search for: "John Doe Correction Officer #1" Results 501 - 520 of 1,218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2017, 10:58 am by Colby Pastre
Correcting the overstatement implies a business tax incidence split roughly 50-50 between capital and labor, more in line with the empirical literature. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 5:30 am by Colby Pastre
While it is true that such a tax would be regressive, that does not mean that exemptions are the correct policy choice. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
” from the above — because what does the cited provision of the TMEP say? [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 8:02 pm by Ilya Somin
He concludes that Section 1373 is not unconstitutional because it “does not require the forced participation of state officers to “administer or enforce a federal regulatory program,” but “merely precludes a state or local government from ‘prohibit[ing], or in any way restrict[ing], any . . . official’” from sharing information with federal officials. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:59 am by Terry Hart
Warfel (New York: Literary Publishers, 1953), 1-4. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Tenth Circuit: The officers violated the Fourth Amendment; the nephew gets $1 in damages. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
” In unpacking this phrase, consider first what Black consciously does not. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
In the following blog post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a comprehensive look that problems involved with making payments in response to a ransomware attack. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:21 am by Schachtman
Tarry’s third example is a study conducted under the leadership of the late Joseph Gitlin, at Johns Hopkins Medical School. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
Principled pragmatism, of the sort suggested by John Ruggie in the construction of the UNGP, then require a balancing of law and norm, of enterprise and state, and of engagement and judgement (here ¶¶ 70-81). [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 10:12 am
This principle does not end our inquiry, however. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The story was judged to be inaccurate by IPSO, and a further correction has been requested. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm by David Kopel
” Second Amendment standards: The court addressed two questions: (1) “Does a law-abiding responsible citizen have a right to defend his home from criminals using whatever common magazine size he or she judges best suits the situation? [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
”   Document 2: Memorandum Opinion and Order, Judge Bates This memorandum opinion and order from Judge John D. [read post]