Search for: "Judicial Standards Commission Rules" Results 501 - 520 of 3,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 5:22 am by Florian Mueller
If so, what does it intend to do to prevent the abuse of immunity rights and defend the EU citizens' and employees' rights and the community acquis in organisations such as EPO which while exercising judicial functions is at the same time breaching the European legal order rules? [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am by Eoin Daly
This, it is argued, may ultimately undermine the rule of law and the safeguarding of constitutional rights against the political organs of the State. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether the Duracraft Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether the Duracraft Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
Prosecution attorney Major Christopher Dykstra responds that Williams merely clarified the existing standard of judicial recusal in most jurisdictions, and that contrary to Connell’s argument, “the convening authority is neither a prosecutor or a judge. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:49 am by Florian Mueller
The current Judicial Review standard makes it relatively hard--though far from impossible--to get CMA decisions reversed. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
2016 was another big year in anti-SLAPP litigation – with the Appeals Court issuing a slew of Rule 1:28 decisions, the Supreme Judicial Court granting Direct or Further Appellate Review to consider issues ranging from the proper procedure for appealing the allowance of an anti-SLAPP motion to whether theDuracraft Corp. v. [read post]
These comments will help to sharpen the Commission’s enforcement work and may inform reform by Congress or other policymakers, even if the Commission does not ultimately promulgate new trade regulation rules. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:48 am by Josh Blackman
As the Court has long stated, judicial review under that standard is deferential to the agency. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
  It means that your standard form FOIA SEC rule references are probably soon to be out of date. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 2:41 pm by Gail Whittemore
”In 2004, Justice Antonin Scalia concluded that political gerrymandering claims are nonjusticiable, because “no judicially discernible and manageable standards for adjudicating such claims exist. [read post]
28 May 2015, 11:32 am by Federal Employment Law Insider
Because of the far-reaching implications of the order and the likelihood that the regulations also will be expansive, a judicial challenge is expected against the proposed regulations. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:31 am by Julie Brill and Winston Maxwell
  This approach is similar to Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) or the data privacy governance certificate proposed by the CNIL. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Coulter applied for a judicial review of IPSO’s handling of the original complaints. [read post]
More, courts have a limited review over IWC Wage Orders, holding them only to an arbitrary and capricious standard and imposing “as little judicial interference as possible. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:34 pm by Jane Chong
Second, law-of-war military commissions are Executive Branch tribunals that cannot encroach upon the Article III judicial power to try purely domestic crimes. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 11:58 am by admin
Judge Kelley is a member of the Iowa Judges Association (President 1996-97); the American Bar Association, Judicial Division; the Conference of state Trial Court Judges (Jury Standards Committee and Jury Management Committee, 1994-97); and the Iowa Judicial Council Subcommittee on Records Management and Retention (chair). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
The five justices ruling in the majority performed a routine of judicial acrobatics to construct a legal argument sanctioning religious discrimination. [read post]