Search for: "Kramer v Kramer" Results 501 - 520 of 834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2022, 5:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although an attorney representing the executor of an estate, generally, is not liable to the beneficiaries of the estate (see Kramer v Belfi, 106 AD2d 615, 616), as the attorney does not represent the estate itself (see Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d at 816; Matter of Hof, 102 AD2d 591, 593), when fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances exist, an attorney may be liable to those third parties, even though not in privity with them, for harm caused by… [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
This is a confirmation of his earlier observations in Undre v London Borough of Harrow [2016] EWHC 931 (QB). [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Authored by David Kramer, Brian Witten and Jason Mollick of Wilson Sonsini. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Friedman, P.C, 153 AD3d 1250, 1251; Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d 812, 813; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d 1082, 1083). [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 7:47 am by Al Nye
I especially enjoy how she often describes evidence scenes, like this one in her review of Kramer v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:42 pm by tjsllibrary
Faculty often assign legal-themed movies, with titles such as My Cousin Vinny, Kramer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by Jim von der Heydt
  It is, in fact, impossible to conceive how it could have done so more overtly than in Bush v. [read post]