Search for: "LIMB v. LIMB"
Results 501 - 520
of 859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm
On the first limb of Ground 2, the question of whether there was adequate consultation, the Appellant was also successful. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
But Lord Justice Atkins’ conclusion on this limb of the case highlights the near-impossibility, at least in the present state of authority, of doing anything about it if a final look shows the result to be unjust. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
Smith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Plaintiffs in Daubert v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 7:20 am
Blehm v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:25 am
The segment reports that the wheelchair-bound Mertsaris has difficulty controlling his limbs due to his cerebral palsy. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 1:51 pm
No violation of the substantive limb of Article 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment) of the Convention. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 1:51 pm
No violation of the substantive limb of Article 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment) of the Convention. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
The testThe General Court characterised the essential function of a trade mark as having two limbs. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the US Supreme Court’s decision in the Jack Daniel’s v VIP IP dispute. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:32 am
The (supposed) test The leading case on professional advisors’ potential conflict of interest is Bolkiah v KPMG [1999] 2 AC 222¸where professional advisors (in an analogous position to solicitors) formerly acted for an applicant who then wished to restrain them from acting for its opponent. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 4:23 pm
It may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Locascia and Others v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) - read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State the Home Department in this case. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:09 pm
McDowell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:47 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
In invalidating the “disparagement” section of the Lanham Act in Matal v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:46 am
Hudson v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 7:17 am
Additional Resources: Connor v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:02 pm
In Wood v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
