Search for: "Lynch, Appeal of" Results 501 - 520 of 1,818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2017, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
This Court should either rehear the matter and vacate the injunction entirely or allow it to be appealed to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” However, the Commissioner opined that this statement by the Appellate Division in Abdullah was not intended to overrule Matter of Lynch v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
On to the Second Circuit Kalanick and Uber appealed. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
On to the Second Circuit Kalanick and Uber appealed. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is important for plaintiff because, as the Court of Appeals (Lynch, Cabranes and Matsumoto D.J.] points out, plaintiff may have a claim arising from her brief pregnancy-related termination, but the damages arising from that claim may be slight.Plaintiff claims constructive discharge in violation of Title VII because management made her working conditions so horrible that she had no choice but to resign. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 7:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" So the Court of Appeals (Lynch, Cabranes and Matsumoto D.J.] draws from Supreme Court authority on when to calculate the statute of limitations in wrongful discharge claims. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:08 pm by CJLF Staff
  Murphy appealed citing the jurisdiction issue and claimed he was mentally retarded. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 4:56 am by SHG
“In Australia,” he told me over email, “justice is served through our established justice system,” not through a “social media lynch mob. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:20 am by Andrew Hamm
 Panelists will include Judge Gerard Lynch of the U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
At a minimum, that evidence may entitle you to a trial, and then a jury decides if the work environment was offensive enough to violate Title VII.The Court of Appeals (Hall, Lynch and Droney) says the district court did not view the summary judgment evidence in the light most favorable to the pro se plaintiff. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am by Wolfgang Demino
 Plaintiff also seeks an additional $2,500 for post-judgment motions, $5,000 for an appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and $2,500 for an appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]