Search for: "MARCH v. PETER"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2019, 9:11 pm
Assistant AG Peter A. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
Warby LJ, with whom Laing LJ and Peter Jackson LJ agreed, upheld the conclusion that the legislative scheme requires the Commissioner to receive and consider a complaint and then provides the Commissioner with a broad discretion as to whether to conduct a further investigation and, if so, to what extent [80]. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:53 am
Peter J. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) US Patents –… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) US Patents –… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
A judgment delivered on March 17, 2009, by Deputy High Judge Chen Jiangyao (???) [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
Bush v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:10 am
As NRDC’s Peter Lehner said yesterday: “They are fiddling while Rome burns. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
Peter Padilla: NO! [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm
City of Long Branch v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:32 pm
On March 12 last year Summerfield Browne applied to strike out the honest opinion and public interest defences and sought summary judgment on the truth defence. [read post]
25 May 2022, 10:19 am
VoiceAge EVS v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
Arguing first, for private industry challengers, will be Peter D. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:03 am
State, 357 S.W.3d 66 (Texas Court of Appeals 2011) (quoting Peter T. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:56 am
This Kat commented in March 2013 on sister blog, IP Finance, about the Samsung challenge to Apple's "cool" factor ("Apple v Samsung: The War over 'Cool'") here. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 11:07 pm
"The following passage on Toyota is...well, interesting:"Toyota aims to sell 10.29 million vehicles across the group in the fiscal year ending March 2022. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Schill, Maffezini v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:17 am
ZT Holdings, LLC2, Opposition Nos. 91208416 and 912173743 (March 29, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:38 pm
The following post was written by Peter W. [read post]
