Search for: "MERCK & CO."
Results 501 - 520
of 1,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2008, 7:56 pm
Join Law.com bloggers and co-hosts J. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:05 am
Merck & Co., 653 F.3d 95, 100-01 (2d Cir. 2011), involved consolidated products liability actions brought by prescription drug users against a drug manufacturer. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:14 pm
Seeger, along with co-lead counsel Bryan Aylstock of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz announced the settlement on Tuesday. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:33 pm
(John Elwood) With the Supreme Court’s two opinions today in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:56 pm
Merck & Co., Inc., No. 5:13-cv-04057-BLF, 2016 WL 146574 (N.D. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 10:27 am
Made by Merck & Co., Fosamax has been a successful bone disease treatment on the market for over a decade. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:29 am
(photo: Vioxx back in the day . . . . ) We were just talking the other day at the IP ADR Blog about the power of contingent agreements to settle lawsuits in connection with the recent Verizon/Vonage settlement here.Now its the turn of another BIG "V" LAWSUIT -- Merck's Vioxx litigation -- to benefit itself with the largest drug settlement ever but only in the event 85% of all 26,600 litigants agree to drop their cases.Here's… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:29 am
(photo: Vioxx back in the day . . . . ) We were just talking the other day at the IP ADR Blog about the power of contingent agreements to settle lawsuits in connection with the recent Verizon/Vonage settlement here.Now its the turn of another BIG "V" LAWSUIT -- Merck's Vioxx litigation -- to benefit itself with the largest drug settlement ever but only in the event 85% of all 26,600 litigants agree to drop their cases.Here's… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:52 pm
Merck & Co., 878 P.2d 948 (Nev. 1994), there's a majority in favor of the learned intermediary rule. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:12 am
One cannot show nonobviousness by attacking referencesindividually where the rejections are based on combinations of references.In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097(Fed. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:42 am
See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 426 (CCPA 1981)(finding that one cannot show nonobviousness by attacking references individually where the rejections are based on combinations of references); see also In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
See In re Merck & Co. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Merck & Co., 2007 WL 2493917 (N.J. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:33 pm
Merck & Co., Inc., --- A.2d ----, 2007 WL 91446, *1 (N.J.Super.A.D. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 2014 WL 6765718 (S.D.Cal.) [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:33 pm
The recent 10-Q filing of Merck & Co., Inc. stated in part: The Company has received letters from the DOJ and the SEC that seek information about activities in a number of countries and reference the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 3:25 pm
Now that 95% of eligible plaintiffs have opted in, the $100 million defective medical device settlement between NuvaRing manufacturer Merck & Co. and 3,800 claimants will stand. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:41 pm
Women are continuing to file defective medical device/drug injury cases against Merck & Co. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
Merck & Co. [read post]