Search for: "MILLER v. PAGE" Results 501 - 520 of 1,000
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 13-8915, a one-time relist asking whether Miller v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:40 am
 Further, if a delay in seeking litigation is lengthy, prejudice is more likely to have occurred and less proof of prejudice will be required:  Miller v Glenn Miller Prod., Inc., 454 F.3d 975, 1000 (9th Cir. 2006). [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:28 am by Jeff Welty
This week, the state supreme court heard oral arguments on the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., 461 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2006) (affirming summary judgment in disparate treatment discharge case, and noting judicial tendency to require “comparability” between plaintiffs and comparison group as a “natural response to cherry-picking by plaintiffs”); Miller v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:15 am by WSLL
., a Wyoming corporation v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:14 am by WSLL
AND LUCY PATTEN DAVIS FOUNDATION AND AMY DAVIS, Individually v. [read post]
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has… [read post]