Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2020, 7:20 am
As Stanford patent scholar Mark Lemley puts it, "this could be the most tone-deaf IP suit in history. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:38 pm
" Stanford's Mark Lemley characterized the Bell/Gray dispute in the following manner:"It's not that we wouldn't have had the telephone. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:46 am
Footnote 44 is Mark A. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Mark Lemley: interesting that your examples weren’t traditional franchises like McDonald’s and Starbucks. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
"Mark Schultz – The author's Trade Secret Protection Index shows the relationship between the strength of a country's trade secret laws and patenting activity.See also Jacob Sherkow's talk in Breakout 2 – Law, Norms, Forms, and Deepa Varadarajan & Joseph Fishman's paper in the Closing Plenary. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:40 am
Biagioli's conclusion that "we are unable to measure the benefits that IP has for inventors or the costs it has for the public" might remind readers, for example, of Mark Lemley's now-famous critique of what Lemley calls "faith-based IP. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:21 pm
We’ve reached out to Mark Lemley, a named defendant and the lawyer for the two women, as well as the other individuals named in the suit. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 4:11 pm
Mark Lemley is the William H. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:49 am
Dogan and Mark A. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:06 am
Reines pointed to Obama's sponsorship of a law excluding some tax-related patents, which saw a quick death in the Senate, and to Obama's support of so-called "gold plated" patents (an idea stemming largely from an article written by Professor Mark Lemley). [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:14 am
Bessen is not mentioned, but Lemley is-->Mark Lemley and Carl Shapiro analyzed cases reported by Westlaw from 1982 through mid-2005 in which courts awarded a reasonable royalty to the patentee. n93 They identified only fifty-eight such cases over that twenty-three year period. n94 Curiously, they noted that cases in which courts award lost profits are more prevalent than reasonable royalty cases, while the PWC Study concluded the opposite. n95The core empirical… [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Mark A. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:23 am
” As Mark Lemley says, lots of businesses firmly believe that the phrase “unfair competition” is redundant. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:16 pm
Rev. 1219 (2004); Mark A. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:46 pm
If you guessed "Mark Lemley," you are right. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 7:57 pm
Contrary to certain arguments by Mark Lemley, there was no simultaneous invention by others, and the concept was re-discovered much later. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 9:51 pm
Recall, Mark Lemley is not a patent attorney, either, but newspapers write otherwise, without correction.The Morningstar story DOES get into patent quality, in an odd way: The poor quality of patent examinations harms Aharonian and Morsa by forcing them to pay from thousands to tens of thousands of dollars in fees to argue " spurious rejections" of their patent applications, the suit said. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:01 am
Perhaps Noyce and Kilby are not as recognizable names as Nixon, but Kilby did get a Nobel Prize for his work.See alsohttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/08/did-mark-lemley-name-gary-boone-as.html [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:45 pm
Mark Lemley, arguing in favor of a federal trademark dilution law, submitted a list of 186 "something-bay-dot-coms" to Congress in 2005. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 9:51 am
In passing, there is a sort of microcosm of the problem in the use by Sheppard of arguments made by Reavy, which separately reminds IPBiz of the use by Mark Lemley of the "transistor as hearing aid" saga proposed by someone other than Lemley (which separately was totally untrue). [read post]
