Search for: "Marks v. United States of America" Results 501 - 520 of 1,688
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am by Cheryl Beise
Frito-Lay North America, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2017-1959, 04 October 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 12:52 am
Floyd LJ summarised it as "the criterion which the law has adopted for determining whether a foreign website which is accessible from the state in which the trade mark is protected should be treated as using a sign in the course of trade in relation to goods or services in that state. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:50 am by JB
The rot has been growing for some time, and has now reached the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm by Schachtman
Fisher noted that Lanier had been branded as deceptive by the second highest court in the United States, the United States Court of Appeals, in Christopher v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will consider whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The prefatory language said: Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years… [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:58 am by David Laufman
And the Justice Department obtained another FARA conviction in May, in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:25 am by petrocohen
  Almost 150,000 judges and lawyers across the United States have participated in the American Inns of Court program. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Volpe, 401 US 402, 415 (1971) (decision of the Secretary of Transportation comes with a “presumption of regularity” concerning “the official acts of public officers and, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties”), and United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm by Afro Leo
  A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here  in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of… [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Gaughan
In today’s America, the underlying issues at play in contract, tort, consumer protection and environmental law transcend state lines. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 2:00 am by Julie Adams, FordHarrison
  In the world of television, networks have used the Nielsen rating system, since 1947, to measure audience size and composition of television programming in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 2:00 am by Julie Adams, FordHarrison
  In the world of television, networks have used the Nielsen rating system, since 1947, to measure audience size and composition of television programming in the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:17 pm by Sme
United States (U.S., June 21, 2018) (reversing 7th Circuit: Employee stock options are not taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act: they are not “money remuneration. [read post]