Search for: "Martin by and Through Martin v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2014, 10:26 am
Senators Ron Wyden, Mark Udall, and Martin Heinrich: Three senators who sit on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence make clear that they have “have seen no evidence that the bulk collection of Americans’ phone records has provided any intelligence of value that could not have been gathered through means that caused far less harm to the privacy interests of millions of Americans. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:25 am
Supreme Court decision, Carcieri v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Martin A. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:05 am
” United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
Rostholder v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Marshall (2006) case (which I observed as a clerk) and the Stern v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) in Weisfelner v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:30 am
“Only the Supreme Court can finally resolve these issues, and I hope it will,” she wrote.In urging the Supreme Court to hear the case, United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
The statute (Section 2711) defines governmental entity as "a department or agency of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof." [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
United States, 915 F.2d 699, 712 (D.C. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
“Many distinguished leaders in government, academia, science and business are Yale alumni, including three of the past four United States presidents. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
But at least for now, States can move to change existing laws through their legislatures without being concerned about the preclearance mandate. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm
” In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in Troxel v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
