Search for: "Martinez v. Day" Results 501 - 520 of 616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by John Elwood
Thomas, No. 10-63, or Martinez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am by MOTP
In response, the trial court advised counsel: "If you want to submit anything else I will allow you all to do that within ten days" and "I will let both of you submit something within ten days. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
Thaler, 11-10870, for Trevino, although Washington might be a GVR for Martinez v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:35 pm
The statute reviewed was essentially the same one the United States Supreme Court reviewed in Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the county on the employee’s age discrimination and workers’ compensation claims (Pena v County of Starr, December 18, 2013, Martinez, R). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
Saturday, 28 January 2023 marked data protection day. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Graham Smith
The CJEU’s decision in Pinckneydoes not improve with closer acquaintance. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Day, No. 05-4285 "Order resentencing defendant following his guilty plea to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute over one thousand kilograms of marijuana is vacated where the court violated: 1) defendant's right to be present at resentencing; 2) his right to notice that the court intended to impose an adverse non-Guidelines sentence; and 3) 18 U.S.C. section 3553(c), which requires a sentencing judge to state in open court the reasons for imposing a… [read post]