Search for: "Matter of Andrew B." Results 501 - 520 of 1,063
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse weighs in on the question of whether and when appellate judges may consult the facts outside the record in a case, suggesting that “there should be a line between facts — and attitudes — that judges can apply to the matter at hand, and those they can’t. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
For a spirited defense of this approach, see this nice piece by Akhil Amar and my colleague Josh Chafetz.4) Finally, if all else fails, there's what we might call the Andrew Jackson approach--named for the President who, so the probably-false legend goes, said in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Worcester v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
According to the felony complaint, Cooper continued to operate CMC Recovery Services, Inc., d/b/a Legal Action Recovery located on Bailey Avenue in Buffalo in violation of a May 2009 court order barring him from the business. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 4:53 pm
"The approach is based on the principle of 'guilty until proven innocent' and substitutes proper judicial process for a kangaroo court," said Andrew Heaney, the executive director of strategy and regulation at TalkTalk. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:36 am by Stephen Jenei
Additional guidance on patent subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:52 pm by Adeline Chong
Senior Judge Andrew Ang acknowledged that “the Mareva injunction remains, at its very core, ancillary to a main substantive cause of action. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during November 2023 Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in November and relate to reordering, exhumation, and churchyards. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm by Jeff Welty
Agency A of course may report the matter to agency B, but the statute doesn’t require that. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Unless a defendant can obtain summary judgment, they are often faced with the invidious binary options of defending the matter until trial or settling a claim which might otherwise be disposed of at trial on the basis that the claimant’s evidence of serious harm does not meet the necessary threshold (or because a substantive defence succeeds). [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Now it’s also former Mueller investigation prosecutor Andrew Weissmann (“A myopic focus on the Jan. 6 riot is not the way to proceed if you are trying to follow the facts where they lead and to hold people ‘at any level’ criminally accountable, as Attorney General Merrick Garland promised”). [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
Third, § 201(b)(3) repeats much of the language 201(b)(1) but extends the range of criminal conduct beyond just “official act[s]. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:30 pm by Yvonne Daly
Thirdly, Andrew Hall QC of Doughty Street Chambers asks “Where do the advocates stand when the goal posts are moved? [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Andrew Goldman, Knowledge Ecology International: should be presumptive renewal of previously granted exemptions. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Whether a particular warning should have been in a different location, in pictures, in bright red, or in a different language frankly doesn’t matter nearly as much when the warning’s intended recipient is a prescribing physician. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Two significant decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada shortly after the introduction of the Charter—Andrews v. [read post]